Uncategorized
The Phoenix
This documentary aims to inspire and empower viewers by showcasing the transformative journeys of individuals overcoming dysfunction, disturbance, and disability through resilience, innovation, and entrepreneurial spirit, and encouraging a rethinking of collective coexistence based on empathy, collaboration, and shared opportunity.
By focusing on the personal stories of the protagonists and their inspirational achievements, “The Phoenix” seeks to foster a deeper understanding and appreciation of the humanity in all of us and the potential for growth and transformation in the face of adversity.
Synopsis: “The Phoenix” is a captivating feature documentary that chronicles the transformative journeys of individuals born into difficult situations or confronted by adversity. The film explores their powerful potential, resilience, and entrepreneurial spirit as they overcome dysfunction, disturbance, and disability. Through their inspiring stories, “The Phoenix” aims to help people outside of these communities see the humanity in all of us and rethink our collective coexistence, highlighting the mental, physical, and innovative actions taken by the protagonists to overcome obstacles and seize opportunities.
Act 1: The Birth of Potential
- Introduction:
- Narration introduces the concept of potential and resilience in the face of adversity, emphasizing the transformative power of opportunity and the universality of human experience.
- Personal Stories:
- Introduce the protagonists of the documentary, individuals born into difficult situations or confronted by adversity, providing a glimpse into their early life experiences and the challenges they faced.
Act 2: Overcoming Dysfunction and Disturbance
- Mental Transformation:
- Explore the mental resilience and mindset shifts that enabled the protagonists to overcome dysfunction and disturbance, focusing on their determination, self-belief, and vision for a better future.
- Physical Triumphs:
- Highlight the physical challenges and disabilities faced by the protagonists and their journey of overcoming these obstacles through perseverance, adaptability, and innovative solutions.
Act 3: Opportunity as Advantage
- Entrepreneurial Spirit:
- Showcase the entrepreneurial endeavors and initiatives undertaken by the protagonists, emphasizing their creativity, resourcefulness, and ability to turn adversity into opportunity.
- Innovative Actions:
- Explore the innovative actions and solutions implemented by the protagonists to address the challenges and limitations imposed by their difficult situations, highlighting their adaptability, problem-solving skills, and resilience.
Act 4: Rethinking Collective Coexistence
- Humanity in All of Us:
- Through the inspiring stories of the protagonists, encourage viewers to see the humanity in all of us and challenge preconceived notions and stereotypes, fostering empathy, understanding, and compassion.
- Reimagining Community and Collaboration:
- Advocate for a rethinking of collective coexistence, emphasizing the importance of community support, collaboration, and inclusivity in fostering resilience, empowerment, and shared prosperity.
- Call to Action:
- Inspire viewers to actively contribute to building inclusive, supportive, and resilient communities, encouraging empathy, collaboration, and mutual respect in our collective coexistence.
Closing Remarks:
Narration emphasizes the universal potential for growth, resilience, and transformation within each of us, highlighting the importance of recognizing and nurturing the inherent potential in individuals facing adversity, and fostering a culture of empathy, collaboration, and shared opportunity in our collective coexistence.
This documentary aims to inspire and empower viewers by showcasing the transformative journeys of individuals.
Submissions:
[wpforms id=”31823″ title=”false”]
Sociocracy, consent-based decisions, and open-source governance—explained (and de-mythified)
The Big Picture
Most groups stall not from lack of passion, but from unclear power and slow decisions.
Sociocracy + consent-based decision-making offer a simple upgrade: roles, feedback loops, and “good-enough for now, safe-enough to try” decisions—so teams learn fast without power plays.
⚠️ What People Get Wrong
- “Consent = unanimous agreement.”
Nope. Consent means no reasoned objection—not perfect love. - “Circles are endless meetings.”
Circles are role-based teams with clear aims, meeting agendas, and metrics. - “Open-source governance is chaos.”
It’s transparent rules + documented processes; contribution ≠ control. - “We’ll lose leadership.”
Leadership shifts from bossing to stewarding: set context, enable roles, remove blockers.
How It Works (in 90 seconds)
- Circles: Semi-autonomous teams with a defined aim, domain, and metrics.
- Double-linking: Each circle links up/down via two roles (Lead + Delegate) to keep information flowing.
- Consent decisions: Proposals move unless someone raises a specific, reasoned objection tied to the circle’s aim/safety.
- Driver → Proposal → Integrate: Start from a need, craft a small, testable proposal, integrate feedback, review by date.
- Transparent backlog: Issues, roles, policies, and metrics are visible-by-default (open-source principle).
Facilitator Cheatsheet
Use this script to keep momentum and psychological safety.
- Frame the driver: “The need we’re addressing is… (1 sentence).”
- Offer a tiny proposal: “Good-enough, safe-enough to try for 30 days.”
- Round for clarifying questions (no debates).
- Quick reactions (1 line each).
- Amend & restate proposal.
- Consent round: “Any reasoned objection?” If yes → integrate; if no → adopt and set review date.
- Document the policy/role in the public repo or handbook.
Timebox: 15–25 minutes.
Minimal Roles That Unlock Flow
- Lead Link (Steward): Clarifies priorities, invites proposals, protects scope.
- Facilitator: Runs rounds, surfaces objections, guards time.
- Secretary: Publishes roles/policies; tracks metrics & review dates.
- Rep Link (Delegate): Carries tensions upward; ensures voice of the circle is heard.
What to Track (Simple Metrics)
- Decision cycle time (proposal → adopted).
- % proposals timeboxed with review dates.
- # reasoned objections integrated (learning rate).
- Policy clarity score (team pulse: 1–5).
- Contributor onboarding time (open-source health).
Myths → Facts
- Myth: “Consensus = consent.” → Fact: Consent ≠ everyone loves it; it’s no harm, learn fast.
- Myth: “Flattening kills speed.” → Fact: Clear domains + tiny tests accelerate.
- Myth: “Open = vulnerable.” → Fact: Documented rules reduce shadow power and single points of failure.
30-Day Starter Plan (Bridge to the Future)
Week 1: Pick one team → define aim, domain, metrics. Publish in a shared doc/repo.
Week 2: Train a facilitator + secretary. Pilot consent rounds on small decisions only.
Week 3: Write two policies (e.g., “Publishing Checklist,” “PR Review”). Timebox each to 60–90 days.
Week 4: Add double-link to adjacent team; run a retrospective; prune/renew roles.
Always: Document in the open; prefer tiny reversible bets over big arguments.
Open-Source Governance Essentials
- Visible backlog + issues (anyone can raise, few can merge).
- CODEOWNERS / reviewers by domain.
- Decision log with dates, rationale, and sunset/renewal.
- Contributor ladder: clear steps from newcomer → maintainer.
Facilitation Prompts (steal these)
- “What’s the smallest test that would teach us the most?”
- “Is this a reasoned objection or a preference?”
- “What review date makes this safe enough to try?”
- “Where should this policy live so it’s obvious next time?”
Takeaway
- Sociocracy + consent + open-source governance aren’t ideology—they’re operating systems for trust and speed.
- Ship small, learn quickly, write it down, and let structure carry the load, not personalities.
Uncategorized
Right Livelihood wins Alternative Nobel Prize for Advancing Digital Democracy and Bringing Human Dignity to the Heart of AI
Audrey Tang, Taiwan’s civic hacker and cyber ambassador, will receive the 2025 Right Livelihood Award in Stockholm on 2 December. She is being honoured for pioneering the
social use of frontier technologies to strengthen democracy, counter polarisation and put human dignity at the centre of innovation.
The 2025 Right Livelihood Award, also known as the “Alternative Nobel Prize,” is being given to four Laureates: Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change and Julian Aguon
(Pacific Islands and Guam), Justice For Myanmar (Myanmar), Audrey Tang (Taiwan), and Emergency Response Rooms (Sudan).
Since 1980, the Right Livelihood Award has recognised 203 Laureates from 81 countries, celebrating their courage to solve global problems
