Connect with us

INSIGHTS

What is the message that Norman Lear left us with?

Published

on

By Howard Bloom

Norman Lear died Tuesday, December 5th,  at the age of 101 at his home in LA.  The headlines mourn his passing.  What they miss is his victory.

Norman Lear lived to be 101 years old.  That’s a startling achievement.

Why was Lear able to live so long?  In part, because he cherished the joys in life.  He said, “Life is made up of small pleasures. Happiness is made up of those tiny successes. …And if you don’t collect all these tiny successes, the big ones don’t really mean anything.”

Eight years ago, Lear added that, “I’ve lived my life moment to moment, day to day, and even though I appear 93, I never lost my childlike view of the world.”

Who was Norman Lear? One New York Times headline says that Lear’s “Comedies Changed the Face of TV.” Another New York Times headline adds that Lear was “TV’s Greatest American.”  The Washington Post explains that Lear was the man who “brought social commentary to the sitcoms.”

Norman Lear created or developed over 100 TV series.  Those series included iconic shows like All in the Family, the Jeffersons, Maude, Sanford and Son, Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman, One Day at a Time, and Different Strokes.   Lear was nominated for eighteen Emmies and won six.  He won two Peabody Awards and the Peabody Lifetime Achievement Award.  He made the Television Academy Hall of Fame in 1984, and was given the National Medal of Arts in 1999 by President Bill Clinton.

Beginning in 1959, Lear produced up to nine TV series in a single year.

Variety says that from 1972 to 1975, Lear often monopolized the top two slots in the ratings, with All in the Family at number one and Sanford and Son at number two.

What’s more, Lear inspired two films from the actor who played Meathead In All in the Family, Rob Reiner.  Those films were Spinal Tap and The Princess Bride.

The celebrities who’ve issued statements or online postings expressing their love for Norman Lear are revealing.  They include Jimmy Kimmel, Jane Fonda, George Clooney, Rita Moreno, Ben Stiller, Mark Ruffalo, Alec Baldwin, William Shatner, Disney head Bob Iger and Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi.

Tyler Perry says Lear’s shows saved his life.  They were the only thing, he recalls, “that brought laughter and joy to me as a child, who was living a daily nightmare.”  What’s more, the example of Lear’s life, says Perry, “taught me to dream a bigger dream.”

Says Rita Moreno, “our nation has lost a treasured looking glass.”

Norman Lear’s life was not easy.  He grew up in New Haven, Connecticut.  His father went to prison for three years when Norman was nine years old.  His dad’s crime?  Selling fake bonds.  Lear’s mother had to come up with the money to keep the family going.

Then, when his father returned, the arguments between his parents were nuclear. Recalls Lear, “I used to sit at the kitchen table and I would score their arguments. I would give her points for this, him points for that, as a way of coping with it.” These arguments would later inspire the conflicts in All in the Family.

Things did not get any easier when Lear went off to college.  Says Variety, “He dropped out of Boston’s Emerson College to enlist in the U.S. Air Force in 1942, and served as a radio operator and gunner on B-17 bombers in the European theater, flying 52 missions.”  In other words, Norman Lear was among the tiny 25% who survived the flack and anti-aircraft fire that downed American airplanes dropping bombs on Nazi territory.

In the early eighties, at the height of his success, Lear went broke and was almost forced to sell his house. He recalls, “”Having heard that we’d fallen into such dire straits, my son-in-law phoned me and asked how I was feeling,” Lear wrote. “My answer was, ‘Terrible, of course,’ but then I added, ‘But I must be crazy, because despite all that’s happened, I keep hearing this inner voice saying, ‘Even this I get to experience.’”  And that is what Norman Lear would title his 2014 book, Even This I Get to Experience.

Norman Lear was a collector of extreme experiences.  And those experiences expanded his empathy.  Another factor in his success.

Lear also founded the liberal group People for the American Way in 1981.  But that organization was not created to widen the political fractures in our society.  It was created to heal them.  Which was very typical of Norman Lear.

For a reason you wouldn’t expect.  Lear said that he had spent a good part of his life watching live studio audiences and looking for belly laughs. The belly laugh is a very elusive beast.  It expresses something in us that has no words.  Something inside of us that even we don’t see. Something that has no way to speak until it’s tapped by humor. That something is the soul.  Your soul and mine.  Politics has many words.  The source of the belly laugh has few.  It gets its voice through comedy.

Lear’s quest for the belly laugh made him realize that politics belonged in his shows.  He said, “we were working before, on average, 240 live people – if you could get them caring, the more they cared, the harder they laughed.”

Political issues like “racism, abortion, homosexuality, [and] the Vietnam war” got people to care.  And in Lear’s comedies, he let opposing voices speak.  All in the Family’s Archie Bunker was a rock-solid conservative.  His son-in-law Meathead was a liberal.  The comedy came when the sparks flew between them.

Meanwhile, Norman Lear has left us a lesson to live by and a standard to meet. Recalls Too Close for Comfort actress Lydia Cornell, “He said he stayed young at the age of 100 by laughing a lot and being grateful for everything.”

And Lear himself concluded that, “Life is about having a good time, and it was a good time.”

References: 

Norman Lear, Even This I Get to Experience, The Penguin Press, 2014.

https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/norman-lear-dead-dies-tv-legend-all-in-the-family-1235823995/

https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/norman-lear-quotes

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/norman-lear-legendary-screenwriter-producer-dead-101

https://www.nickiswift.com/338352/the-untold-truth-of-norman-lear/

https://people.com/stars-pay-tribute-to-norman-lear-after-death-8411312

https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/deathsexmoney/episodes/all-family-norman-lear

Howard Bloom of the Howard Bloom Institute has been called the Einstein, Newton, and Freud of the 21st century by Britain’s Channel 4 TV.  One of his seven books–Global Brain—was the subject of a symposium thrown by the Office of the Secretary of Defense including representatives from the State Department, the Energy Department, DARPA, IBM, and MIT.  His work has been published in The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Wired, Psychology Today, and the Scientific American.  He does news commentary at 1:06 am Eastern Time every Wednesday night on 545 radio stations on Coast to Coast AM.  For more, see http://howardbloom.institute

Continue Reading

INSIGHTS

How do we create the future when the world is upside down?

Published

on

December 21, 2024, New York City.

How do we create the future when the world is upside down?

How can Can Technology Make Us Better Humans?

What if technology could do more than just help us function in everyday life? What if it could actually enhance our abilities—taking us beyond what humans are naturally capable of?

Imagine a world where technology doesn’t just fix problems or make things easier. Instead, it amplifies what we can do, unlocking new potential in every aspect of life.

The Possibility of Superhuman Abilities

Physical Enhancement: What if technology could give us super strength or allow us to run faster than ever before? Wearable exoskeletons or advanced prosthetics are already making huge strides in helping people recover and perform better physically.

Mental Boost: Technology could also enhance our brains. Think about brain-computer interfaces that help us think faster, solve problems more easily, or even improve memory and learning abilities.
Extending Lifespan: Advances in health technology could not only cure diseases but help us live longer, healthier lives, possibly even slowing down the aging process.

Beyond Human Limits

 Technology isn’t just about fixing problems anymore; it’s about pushing past human limits. Imagine artificial intelligence helping us make decisions quicker and more accurately, or even allowing us to explore outer space without the limitations of the human body.

What Does This Mean for our Future?

A New Definition of Humanity:    If technology allows us to surpass our natural limits, what does it mean to be human? We might need to rethink what it means to live, work, and interact with each other in a world where technology enhances our very being.

Ethical Questions:

Along with the possibilities, there are also big questions. Who gets access to these technologies? How do we ensure they’re used safely and ethically?

Technology is already transforming our world in amazing ways, but the real question is: What if it could take us even further? Could it help us become something greater than human? The future might just be filled with new possibilities that allow us to live smarter, stronger, and longer lives—pushing us beyond the limits we once thought were fixed.

--Steven Jay, Co-Founder and Creative Director, Mobilized News
Continue Reading

INSIGHTS

When News Isn’t

Published

on

 

The formula for successful entertainment is short and sweet… conflict. Without conflict movies and television would have no viewers.

By Michael Caporale

When news programming learned this lesson, they introduced opposing pundits to create conflict under the guise of being “fair and balanced.” Whether it’s a police chief and an attorney for the mother of a slain Afro-American son, a hypocrite politician and an emotional constituent, a Republican and a Democrat, a conservative and a progressive, an idiot and a scholar, a scientist and a religious fanatic, all are designed to further conflict.


PLEASE NOTE:  Mobilized is apolitical.  We do not endorse any political party or candidate. However, in these divisive times, we recognize that open discussion is necessary for the resolution of divergent opinions.  Consequently, we have added a new section called FORUMS that will host important OPINIONS posted my Mobilized Members.  These are the opinions of the members alone and do not represent Mobilized News.


It’s time we realized that Pundit news is unwittingly deepening the American divide and stimulating violent conflict on the streets, an expression of the divide, thus propagating real news that can be filmed and displayed. News without a defined editorial purpose has become an agent of chaos rather than clarity.

But there’s another problem. The news is diluted and whitewashed to be palatable to the lowest common denominator, thus rendering it something fit for children rather than adults.

Now I’m really talking about cable news which is not subject to the strict regulations under which broadcast news is licensed. Cable channels can safely use fowl language in the context of reportage of statements made by on camera interviews, yet it is constantly replaced by proxy language such as “the n-word,” the “F-bomb”, the “s-word,” the “c-word” and so on, thus it dulls the effect of hearing such bad language from the mouth of a person not worthy of our respect. It also limits the emotional outrage of the expression itself.

Another example of how news dumbs down content is the ever-present block digitization that obfuscates an image, usually that of children or violent acts. The practice began with legal advisors telling journalists not to show the faces of children when photographing the news. This practice was originally initiated to deny would-be kidnappers and sexual deviants from identifying children on the playground and taking action against them. Now the out-of-focus haze is applied to the faces of migrant Latino children crossing the border in large groups, and wounded children in Palestine and Ukraine and other conflict zones for what reason? To protect them? How does this practice protect them? It denies them the full empathy they deserve, the kind that motivates viewers to get involved and take action.

And let’s also get real about the depiction of violence. Granted it’s not something anyone wants to see, but to assume that an audience cannot withstand the shock of violent imagery is foolhardy in an age where extreme bloody violence is an every-day occurrence in mass entertainment. From video games to Wrestling, to movies like “Braveheart,” it’s not just the kids being conditioned to watch violence in its extremes. Blood is everywhere but news depicting face-ghosted children being carried to an ambulance in a war zone. It blunts the reality and horror of violence, especially that done on our behalf. Once it was brought home in the seventies, it ended a war in Viet Nam. News has the responsibility to deliver objective facts whether distasteful or otherwise.

To see the extreme depths that the practice of obfuscation has plummeted, just take a look at this screen grab from a recent CNN news story, showing the view of a police dashcam. It’s utterly useless and absurd. That should tell you a lot of how we are regarded, not as potential agents of change but as hapless, entranced viewers basking in the golden glow of pure drivel.

Continue Reading

INSIGHTS

Where the MAGA Movement and the Progressive Left Coincide

Published

on

Where the MAGA Movement and the Progressive Left Coincide

Too Far Left To Be Part of the Left

In 2020 I wrote articles and did a lot of social media promotion for the Bernie Sanders campaign. As I recall it was in July of that year that a group of pro-Biden folks came at me with quite a bit of venom. I can’t remember most of the things they said, the names they were calling me, etc.. There is one point that one of them made that still pops up in my mind every now and again though. The funny thing about what this person said is that they said it without a trace of irony: “You know, you’re too far to the left to be part of the left. It’s people like you that are destroying the left. You’re ‘alt-right adjacent.’”

It was the first time I’d heard that term, “alt-right adjacent”. Aside from making my day with their ingenious “too left to be left” crack, and putting aside the fact that the term was just the sort of dreck that people like Rachel Maddow and Chuck Todd were spouting at the time, I realized a year or two later that there was some truth in what my attackers were saying about the adjacency between aspects of the MAGA movement and the actual progressive left.

How and Why “Populism” Became a Dirty Word

Another quite funny thing that started happening in the US around 2015 was the concerted effort by the corporate legacy news media to demonize populism. This began in 2015 just before Donald Trump’s political campaign really took off. This was also the same period when Bernie Sanders’ campaign was beginning to gain a serious and quite large following.

The initial fear mongering by the US donor class that centered around the “dangers” of a populist uprising, were an attempt to knock down Bernie Sanders, not Donald Trump. If you’ll recall, when Trump first entered the race in the Republican Party primary, the Hillary Clinton team were playfully promoting the idea of Trump being the Republican candidate. Their thinking at the time was that it would be wonderful if he became the 2016 Republican nominee. If that happened the election would be a cakewalk for the Dems. Or so they thought.

Then, about six months later it became clear that Donald Trump was not only the Republican frontrunner, he also had a massive following of quite dedicated people who wanted to see him go all the way to the White House. This was the point in the US, when the corporate “left” donor class and their media minions began going blitzkrieg in their attempt to associate populism with the most base aspects of human nature.

Bernie, the “socialist” infiltrator and Trump the “fascist” monster, were being spoken of as wing-nuts, as “threats to democracy”. The potential Hitler and/or Stalin of the 21st century. You’re catching the irony here, yes? A Democracy is, by definition, a form of government in which We The People choose the candidates that WE feel are best qualified to carry out OUR mandates. The corporate swamp had been penetrated from both sides and the reptilian corporate Military Industrial Complex donor class guard were slithering out of its propagandist depths in full force.

The Anti-Democratic Political Donor Class

Bernie Sanders was the most popular politician in the US from 2016 to 2020. Trump was popular too, but Bernie was THE man of the people up until the moment the donor class and the DNC put the kibosh on his candidacy in 2020. Politicians like Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Ron DeSantis and Mitt Romney are all primarily servants of corporate power. That’s where their money and all of their support springs from.

It’s been clear for quite a while now to just about everyone except for the most indoctrinated among us, that our Democracy has been seriously violated in the 21st century. Hundreds of billions, trillions, of our tax dollars have been taken and used by a contingent of obscenely wealthy corporate globalists to generate and perpetuate wars all over the world. This has been the central aim of those who’ve been promoting a “New World Order” since 1990, when the unipolar era, the era of total US dominance began.

We, the US, have become the undisputed scourge of the earth in the 21st Century. 20th Century America was largely admired as a country by people all over the globe. We’re loathed and feared now, by a majority of the world’s population

They Didn’t Want Sanders, Now They’ve Got Trump

This is where the real progressive left and the MAGA movement meet. On the domestic front, obviously, we have quite a few differences to be worked out among us when it comes to issues like guns, abortion, etc.. That said, our similarities, as human beings who care about our families and our friends, who, despite the corporate media’s promotion of our differences, have WAY more in common than those who’ve been controlling our thinking would have us believe.

We’re done with decades of war for profit. We’re done with being gaslighted by a donor-owned media and a political class that have disconnected themselves (for cash) from the needs of the vast majority of our population. Democracy was blocked in 2016 and 2020. Bernie Sanders was, by far, our most popular politician. But the donor owned political class, people like Debbie Wasserman Shultz, Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama, knew better than us. They knew better than to let real democracy work.

They installed their preferred Democratic Party candidates instead. They inserted candidates that wouldn’t challenge the neocon governing model, of perpetual war and corporate control of our institutions. Well, they got their way twice. But not this time. In 2024, democracy functioned. They didn’t want Sanders. Ok, well, now they’ve got Trump and a republican senate and congress.

We, all of us, need to be vigilant from now on. So far the 21st century has been a blood-soaked, greed-laden corporately controlled fiasco. It’s time to start learning to work together. Yes, we have differences. Yes, it will be a challenge. But we have to keep moving with and not against the real democratic process. We must keep challenging our leaders and reminding them that they work for us and not the other way around.

Continue Reading