INSIGHTS
Presentation on Poverty Reduction ( Rio de Janeiro)
Presentation by Denise Paiva at at the POVERTY REDUCTION Event Rio de Janeiro, August 15, 2024. UFRJ, Brazilian College of Advanced Studies
Denise Paiva, a Social Worker for over 50 years, always working in public policies for social assistance and human rights. Today, I am a scholarship holder at ENSP/FIOCRUZ, developing studies and research on the homeless population.
I began my professional life in 1973 at the city hall of Juiz de Fora, working with the homeless population. I am very honored to be here at the invitation of the dear and remarkable Ana Célia Castro from CBAE at UFRJ, and particularly at this youth summit (summits are generally meetings of high-level formal leaders, heads of state, but since I believe that today’s youth are the great leaders of the future who can transform the world, I use the term youth summit for this event). Young people who, by participating in this Student Competition for Poverty Reduction Projects, are certainly capable of making vigorous and creative efforts to create a better world for everyone.
Development: I was once enchanted by a phrase that I have remembered forever: “Being young and not being revolutionary is a biological contradiction, to say the least.” I could certainly be your grandmother, and it is with all my experience and beliefs that I came here today, because I believe that this event will fuel the revolutionary force that will move you to be protagonists of a new model of society committed to poverty reduction.
I know that your ATTENTION is more focused on artificial intelligence, the educational crisis, global warming, the environment, the media and social networks, sports, and music, as examples, but I am going to touch on a topic that may seem distant and blurred to you. Not because your eyes cannot see it, but because it is in fact an invisible phenomenon and is part of the “make-believe” practically all over the world.
According to the UN, there are 150 million people in the world who are homeless or living in temporary shelters. We have data from 90 countries that total 60 million. The champion in total number is Pakistan (8 million) and in relative number is Somalia (almost 17% of the population). This data from 90 countries is organized by total population, homeless population and corresponding percentages. In Brazil, it is estimated that almost 300 thousand people (281 thousand) live on the streets and that there has been an increase of more than 100%, certainly due to the pandemic.
However, it is estimated that there is 15 to 25% under-reporting in relation to statistics on citizens living on the streets, certainly aggravated by wars and refugees/homeless people, and that they suddenly find themselves without shelter and without proper social protection.
This is just an estimate based on official data and NGO reports, but in reality this number could be much higher, as it is difficult to get a true picture of the phenomenon due to the characteristics of this population, their itinerancy and their desire to remain anonymous due to their desire/need for self-protection.
Homeless individuals have a lot of restrictions on the State, as we have seen in previous research – what we call “negative and frustrated expectations”. The longevity of punitive, hygienist, failed experiences, in addition to contradictory policies of a “centaur State”, which welcomes with one hand and strikes with the other, have distanced homeless citizens from social assistance and, more than that, from the State itself. It is quite common for social educators/outreach workers – the first agents to have contact with homeless individuals, a kind of mouthpiece of public policies – to be ignored, rejected and even mistreated.
This type of relationship is not formed by chance; on the contrary, it deserves to be considered based on the type of exchange that the State has carried out with citizens living on the streets, normally called “sinister exchanges” (Igor Ribeiro). When we talk about street pop, we are not talking about a homogeneous segment, but rather a very wide diversity, with various reasons that led them to live under the “moonlight and under the sky”. This phenomenon is global, in poor countries, developing countries, and rich countries alike, and therefore requires a global perspective and a multinational effort to better understand the phenomenon not only from a quantitative and qualitative point of view, but also to seek more effective solutions that better respond to the needs, specificities and, above all, the subjectivities of this population.
Who are they? Why are they on the streets?
● Housing crisis and lack of housing.
● Unemployment. Crisis in the labor market resulting from the global capitalism model.
● Abusive consumption of drugs and alcohol.
● Loss of family and community ties
● Mental health.
● Wars, natural disasters, migrations.
The health issue is very significant! In addition to the health issues that led them to the streets, living on the streets worsens their health problems: tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and hepatitis, malnutrition, dengue fever, chronic diseases and mental disorders.
In short, there are multiple causes, but they are interrelated. One reason leads to another. A vicious cycle is created, a chain of tragedy.
When we think of the homeless population, we immediately think of their dirty, violent and tragic aspect. Either we see them as poor little things who need charity or as dangerous people who need to be cast aside, hidden and criminalized. Look at what happened recently at the Paris Olympics and also at the Brazil Olympics. Something that deserves reflection! Where were they taken? It is a justified measure to “clean” the city, like taking out the trash. They are considered human waste. There is evidence that the Paris City Hall removed more than 12,000 people from the streets, some of whom were scheduled for deportation and others who were sent to such precarious and distant places that they ended up back on the streets. The international press, especially the New York Times, has revealed extreme inhumanity towards this population. They were the target of false promises, lies and deceptions.
However, the most outrageous and recent decision was that of the US Supreme Court, which ratified the decision of some states to consider the life of people on the streets a crime.
Are there successful experiences in ensuring care, autonomy and emancipation for this population? Are there successful experiences in terms of reintegrating these people into the system, or of humanitarian aid to welcome and protect those who do not accept being identified or included in the system?
Yes… we have some references from governments, NGOs and even volunteers, such as the case/example of Alexandra in Luxembourg and Father Julio Lancelotti in Brazil. Public experiences such as Housing First in Finland should also be observed. However, the first home alone is not enough; these people need other care and social protection actions.
I believe that the greatest challenge would involve a global research effort involving several human rights observatories, universities and research centers to identify intervention practices around the world, but above all those that can illuminate and inspire more efficient, effective and effective public policies in relation to this segment. A great reference in studies and research on the homeless population is the Institute of Global Homelessness (IGH), based at DePaul University, in Chicago, USA.
We need to interact with this population with a new perspective, with empathy, establishing bonds of trust, breaking indifference, stereotypes, prejudices and stigmas.
We need to discover the mysteries, talents, dreams and resilience of this population. The path of hope that their positive and creative lives and relationships can discover and create. Identify the possibility of narrowing the gap between potential and performance. There is a hidden wealth, sources of light, energy capable of renewal and overcoming that our eyes, focused on our own living conditions, so distant and different from theirs, do not allow us to see…
Hence our great challenge and our mission when it comes to projects to reduce poverty, as we are committed to in the here and now: “making visible and invisible”.
In conclusion: I suggest that you look for ways to engage young people in this purpose, examples:
● Volunteer programs;
● Work with NGOs to promote cultural, educational, professional and social initiatives;
● Campaigns and lectures;
● Art workshops.
It is important that young people discover innovative and creative ways of participating in actions with the homeless population that break with paternalism and welfare.
I conclude my speech by inviting all of you to learn about the National Visible Streets Plan, a proposal by the Brazilian government embodied in an Action and Monitoring Plan for the Implementation of the National Policy for the Homeless Population.
Help the Brazilian Nation to vocalize to the world the need for a global consensus and coordinated and concrete actions to confront misery and poverty and for a more supportive, fair and humane world for everyone… everyone, including those who are currently considered invisible and/or undesirable, as they were so recently chased off the streets of Paris.
“But between the concrete and the coldness of the world
There is a heart that beats, still fertile
Dreaming of sunny and peaceful days
Where the street is just a path to be made” (author unknown)
INSIGHTS
Is COP Kicking the can further down the road…again?

COP must evolve with the times, or go down the abyss of irrelevancy.
COP 30 lands in Belém, a vulnerable Amazon city, Nov 10–21, 2025. The host nation hopes to spotlight deforestation, Indigenous rights, and climate inequity. Brazil plans to launch the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF)—a proposed $125 billion blended‑finance fund to reward forest conservation.
What’s at risk
- Affordability crisis: Belém has ~18,000 hotel beds for ~45,000 expected attendees. Room rates surged to $700–$2,000/night. Developing nations may be shut out.) Brazil has deployed cruise ships and capped rates for poorer countries—but gaps remain.
- Credibility gap: A new highway cutting through protected rainforest (Avenida Liberdade) contradicts the summit’s conservation message—even though officials deny federal involvement.
- Fossil fuel influence: COP media deal awarded to PR firm Edelman, which also represents Shell—sparking conflict concerns.
Why it may just “kick the can”
- Progress stalled in Bonn: Critical texts—like the Just Transition Work Programme and the Gender Action Plan—are underpowered, with weakening language on Indigenous and gender justice. Negotiations postponed to Belém.
- Ambitious goals, low political will: The annual climate finance scale-up roadmap to $1.3 trillion by 2035 lacks binding commitments. Most countries’ updated NDCs remain underwhelming.
- Logistical chaos: Thousands of civil society, women groups, and youth may be excluded by cost and infrastructure constraints, undermining representation.
Why it still matters
- Location is symbolic: Holding COP in the Amazon aims to humanize climate action, not sanitize it in luxury venues.
- TFFF could deliver: If fully funded by COP or 2026, the forest conservation fund could redefine climate finance.
- Health in focus: A WHO-led Climate & Health conference in Brasília is shaping a Health Action Plan for COP, embedding public health in climate policy.
Bottom line
COP 30 has the potential for impact—but so far, optics risk overshadowing outcomes. High costs, diluted ambition, fossil-fuel influence, and delayed mechanisms could make Belém another kickoff, not a game changer. Unless financial pledges and rights-centered action materialize, COP 30 may merely defer real climate solutions to the next summit.
INSIGHTS
Understanding the Brazil Golden Visa Program

As people in America–and worldwide–are rethinking their residencies, Brazil offers a unique opportunity.
Why it matters
Brazil’s investor visa (VIPER), launched in 2018 and expanded in 2025, offers straight to permanent residency, family inclusion, and a path to citizenship in ~4 years. Designed to attract foreign capital, it’s one of Latin America’s most competitive options.
✅ Pros
- Low investment threshold: BRL 700K (~USD 140K) in the North/Northeast; BRL 1 M (~USD 200K) in other regions.
- Fast processing: Approval typically in 3–6 months.
- Minimal stay requirement: Spend just ~14 days every 2 years in Brazil to maintain residency.(
- Path to citizenship: Apply after 4 years of residency; dual nationality allowed.
- Family included: Spouse and dependents can join under the same investment.
- Access to MERCOSUR: Freedom to live/work across South America and access public services locally.
❌ Cons & caveats
- Capital-intensive: Though cheaper than many EU programs, still requires upfront investment.
- Low liquidity: Must hold qualifying property or business for residency status.
- Complex documentation: Must transfer funds through formal Brazilian banks; property deed must be fully registered.
- Tax implications: Residents become Brazilian tax-liable; must file global income.
- Risk & bureaucracy: Mistakes in property purchase or application can lead to denial.
⚙️ How it works
- Choose investment route:
- Real estate: BRL 1M (~USD 200K), or BRL 700K in North/Northeast.
- Business investment: As low as BRL 150K (~USD 30K) if it creates jobs or invests in tech.
- Acquire property or company with clean title in urban region.
- Transfer funds via central‑bank‑approved channels.
- Apply via MigrantWeb and attend a brief visit (~30 days in-country).
- Receive temp residency (2–4 years), then upgrade to permanent if holding the investment.
- Citizenship after residency plus Portuguese proficiency and clean record.
Real-world impact
- Stimulates foreign investment into Brazilian real estate and startups.
- Helps diversify global mobility: Dual citizens gain visa-free access to ~171 countries.
- Competitive edge: Lower thresholds than Spain, Portugal, and others, with faster timelines and better climate
Who should consider it
- Remote workers or retirees seeking affordable residency in Latin America
- Investors looking for second passports or access to Mercosur markets
- Entrepreneurs or families seeking global mobility and alternate residency options
Bottom line
Brazil’s Golden Visa isn’t just another residency-by-investment program—it’s a strategic gateway to permanent residency, citizenship, and regional access, at competitive cost and with minimal residency obligations.
Whether you’re buying property in Recife or launching a startup in São Paulo, Brazil offers a forward-facing bridge for global citizens—without the EU price tag.
INSIGHTS
We don’t do “that” anymore!

America’s public media system is stuck in a time warp — built for a world that no longer exists.
Back then…
When the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) was founded in 1967, there was:
- ❌ No internet
- ❌ No YouTube
- ❌ No MP3s or MP4s
- ❌ No smartphones
- ❌ No TikTok, file sharing, livestreams, or global DIY distribution
NPR, PBS, and local community stations were born in the age of vinyl and rabbit ears — and many still operate like it’s 1975.
The old model
- Broadcast licenses → transmit radio/TV signals
- Federal subsidies + pledge drives → fund operations
- Audience = passive receivers
All built for one-to-many media when the internet has made everyone a node.
The new reality
Welcome to media in motion:
- Creators self-distribute across platforms
- Real-time news spreads peer-to-peer
- Audiences expect participation, not programming
- Livestreams, podcasts, and video-on-demand rule attention
It’s horse and buggy vs the electric car, and too much of public media is still shoveling hay.
Why it matters
Then | Now |
---|---|
Top-down | Peer-to-peer |
Static schedules | On-demand, everywhere |
Centralized stations | Decentralized communities |
Annual pledge drives | Micro-giving, crowdfunding, subscriptions |
We can’t build the future with our minds in the past. Yet too much of public media clings to legacy systems, dated org charts, and siloed content.
What’s being lost
- Entire generations under 40 have no relationship with public radio or TV
- Community voices, diverse stories, and local impact are drowned out by outdated delivery
- Opportunity for global collaboration, multilingual content, and co-creation is missed
Public media could be a participatory ecosystem — but instead, it’s often a museum exhibit of what media used to be.
What’s next
✅ Shift from broadcast to networked ecosystems
✅ Enable community-owned media nodes
✅ Train creators in digital-first storytelling
✅ Embrace open-source, global collaboration
✅ Reimagine the CPB as a commons infrastructure, not a broadcast subsidy
Bottom line
We don’t do that anymore.
Public media must evolve—or become irrelevant. This is not business as usual. It’s time to flip the script—before the last station fades to static.