INFO-COMM
Is social media suppressing dissident voices?

Media Alert: To protect the safety and security of the authors of this story, we have chosen to make their identifies anonymous.
To discuss this story with its contributors, please email us here and we will make an introduction.
On January 21, a social media user in Los Angeles went to her TikTok account and discovered that it looked different than it did previously.
As a blue-leaning American citizen, the user who wishes to remain anonymous, discovered that some friends and followers of similar political leanings have inadvertently become followers of those they openly oppose, thus possibly amplifying the strength of they who might otherwise wish to suppress their voices. This was all done without their knowledge, approval or by electing such action.
Upon checking her Instagram account she discovered the following as well :
Obviously, the suppression of dissident voices is un-American. So, one has to ask, “Why were the accounts of POTOS and Vice President POTUS added to this user’s “followers account” without their previous knowledge or approval?”
This activity is quite suspicious as it occurred on the very day that Trump took office and enacted his many reforms. Here’s a timeline:
- January 18, TikTok went down for 13 hours and returned on the 19th.
- Left-leaning TikTok followers, who use the platform to discuss politics, noticed a sudden shift in their ‘for you’ pages. Mine was still showing me left-leaning political commentary, tarot cards, history lessons, and fashion. However, I rarely participate in political commentary on my platform, nor do I follow most political figures except AOC, so my page looked all that different.
- On January 21, these same TikTok users began reporting an unexpected change on their Instagram accounts. They had been forced to follow the president and vice president. These were both brand new accounts; they had not been carried over from the former administration, as the account info states; both began in January 2025.
- I checked mine; again, I didn’t follow the former president or vice president, and it did not appear I was following the current vice president or president.
- Before I blocked both accounts, I got nosy to see who our mutual friends were, and I looked at who was following DJT and JDV.
- To my surprise, my father, my sister, and many other friends who I know lean left and who violently speak out against the current administration were, in fact, following DJT and JDV.
- Upon discovering this, I thought it was odd. On January 22, I called my father to see if he was aware that he was following these two. He was unaware, and this violation of his consent was deeply troubling. I encouraged him to look at his Instagram for himself.
- He tried to sign on, only to find that his account had been suspended on January 22 for violating community guidelines.
- Upon trying to file a dispute, he was asked to submit his identification. To my knowledge, this practice had never been asked of users before this encounter.
- My father also publicly expresses his dissatisfaction with the current administration on Facebook and other social media platforms.
- Later, on the 22nd, I watched TikTok reporter Aaron Parnas. (I was following for breaking news, reporting that all of his followers had unfollowed him, and he received notice from a follower that she has to refollow him daily as somehow she has unfollowed him without her consent.
- I put it to the test. As of the 22nd, I was not following him, so I changed that and began to follow him.
- When I opened my TikTok this morning to check if I was following Aaron Parnas like I had left the app the day before, and in fact, I had to follow him again today.
- I was forced to unfollow him overnight.
Is this a planned suppression of dissident voices?
Who is behind this? Is the administration working in concert with the same powerful big tech leaders that were present on the dias during the inauguration and control social media? Who else is being affected?
The father of this user also an American Citizen, received a call from his adult child, with the news that her account appeared to be hacked. As he attempted to log into his rarely used Instagram account, he discovered that the social media giant locked him out, apparently for a violation of their rules IG rules and policies.
He terminated using his Instagram account many months ago and before that used it very seldom. Never had there been a problem with his posts. He quit using the account because he was being inundated by infiltrating by scammers representing themselves as real life friends but who could not answer simple questions regarding their past associations.
He was instructed that he could file an appeal, but the process only allowed for him to press a “submit” button, without offering any defense against their undefined and unexplained reason stating the alleged violation. He was then given a 6-digit code that he in turn submitted and was further directed to validate his identity by submitting a valid identification card that had both his photograph and birthday listed on it, a clear violation of his right to privacy. He did not submit the identity card image to Instagram.
Is this something that is occurring to others and if so, why?
If the answer the above question is yes, then what can be done about this situation? How can social media users protect their accounts so that they are safe, secure and avoid a violation of trust, privacy and freedom of speech and political thought? There are many questions. Are social media platforms useful in sharing information—or should something new emerge, and if so, what?
At a time of rapid change, people everywhere need to understand what is happening, and what we can all do about it.
Those who reported this issue have asked to remain anonymous. However, freedom of speech organizations and Civil Liberties organizations can request information for investigative purposes. Please contact us here.
Flip the Script
The antidote to information overload is Here.

Global Conferences Are Failing Us
The world’s most high-profile gatherings aren’t solving the crises they were built to address.
From COP summits to Davos to the World Social Forum—too many meetings, too few solutions.
Why it matters:
We don’t have time for performative panels and diplomatic selfies. What we need is collaborative action — now.
⚠️ The Problem with “Conference Culture”
COP = More Talk, Less Action: 30 years of climate summits, and emissions are still rising.
Davos for the 1%: The World Economic Forum claims to shape the future—but the future it’s shaping looks like the past.
Social Forums Stall: The World Social Forum preaches change but struggles with implementation and global impact.
All Share a Flaw: Top-down models. Closed rooms. Speeches, not systems.
“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking that created them.” – Albert Einstein
Enter: MobilizedNews.com
A living media network—not just another event.
MobilizedNews.com replaces the “summit” with a 24/7 global collaboration platform.
Think of it as a World’s Fair of Solutions — open-source, decentralized, and action-driven.
Journalism + documentary + grassroots organizing
Decentralized participation, not corporate gatekeeping
Multilingual tools to connect across borders
A system that empowers creation — not consumption
“I must create a system, or be enslaved by another man’s.” – William Blake
✅ What Makes It Different
Always-on: No more waiting for once-a-year events to address urgent issues.
Community-led: Local stories and global solutions co-created by frontline voices.
️ Toolkits over talking points: Real guides to build local food systems, energy co-ops, regenerative economies.
Participate, don’t spectate: Public assemblies, collaborative journalism, and shared intelligence.
What You Can Do
Join the network: MobilizedNews.com is open to contributors, creators, and changemakers.
Flip the script: Pitch a solution, report a story, or collaborate across continents.
Create, don’t conform: Build your own system with tools that work for people, not profit.
Spread the model: Share this platform with networks who are ready to act, not just talk.
The Bottom Line
Old models aren’t broken — they were built not to change.
It’s time to move from pageantry to participation. From talk to tools.
MobilizedNews.com is not another conference. It’s the platform to co-create a future that works — for all of us.
Flip the Script
The Big Picture: Understanding the Evolution in Media

The old newsroom playbook is broken. If journalism wants to stay relevant, it must meet people where they are — mobile, visual, fast, and interactive.
The News Revolution Is Here
The way we get our news has changed — fast.
A new global report reveals that smartphones, influencers, and AI now shape how people learn about the world. And trust? It’s still on shaky ground.
Why it matters:
Media habits are shifting dramatically — and traditional news outlets risk becoming irrelevant if they don’t adapt.
The Big Picture
Mobile dominates: 39% in the U.S. start their day with news on phones — 57% for those under 35.
Social video > headlines: TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram are now core news platforms for Gen Z.
Trust is low: Only 40% globally say they trust most news most of the time.
Avoidance is up: 4 in 10 actively avoid the news — too negative, too confusing.
New Players, New Rules
️ Influencers rising: Joe Rogan reaches over 20% of weekly news consumers in the U.S.
AI enters the chat: 15% of under-25s now use ChatGPT or Gemini for news.
Subscriptions stall: Only 17% pay for news in rich countries — and growth is flat.
Around the World
Asia & Africa leap ahead: Countries like India and Thailand lead in video-first and AI-assisted news habits.
UK lags behind: Just 3% use AI weekly for news.
Alerts matter: Push notifications are one of the last direct channels for publishers — but easily ignored or blocked.
What’s Next
Video is non-negotiable.
Mobile-first design is critical.
AI is here to stay — but must be transparent.
Creators are competitors — and collaborators.
Business models need a reboot.
The takeaway:
The old newsroom playbook is broken. If journalism wants to stay relevant, it must meet people where they are — mobile, visual, fast, and interactive.
INFO-COMM
2025 Tech Trends Webinar

Smart Cities Council invited leading experts to provide quick snapshots of game-changing technologies set to transform our urban landscapes. From Data Privacy to Insider Risk, AI, IoT, sustainable energy, and more, we looked at what might define smart cities in 2025. Watch the recording to gain valuable insights and stay ahead in the rapidly evolving world of urban technology.
Speakers:
- Robyn Francis, Regional Lead Smart Cities Council Asia Pacific – Host
- Nicole Stephensen, Ground Up Privacy – Welcome, Data Privacy, Takeaways
- Sameer Bhandari, Vantiq – AI in Urban Systems and Real Time Data
- Rignesh Soni, SPPlus – AI in Urban Infrastructure and Mobility
- Catherine Caruana-McManus, Meshed IoT – IoT, AI Intersection in Urban Solutions
- Darren Murphy, Core Integrity – Cybersecurity: Insider Threats
- Karandeep Chadha, SCC Intelligent Transport Hubs Task Force and
- Tim Young, Smart Access – AI and Machine Learning in Mobility
- Matthias Gelber, IoT Aggregation
- Nathan Quadros, Veris – 3D City Modelling and Digital Twin Technologies