Connect with us

INSIGHTS

Howard Bloom: Why are American’s so Unhappy?

Published

on

Americans are suffering through a trauma of stolen expectations. The result is what you might call The Great Unhappiness.

First off, are things bad in America right now?  Is the economy tanking?

Not at all.  America is booming.

  • Our economy is growing at 3.2% per year, the highest post-Covid growth rate of any of the G-7 nations.
  • Our unemployment rate is the lowest in over half a century.
  • Our rate of inflation is lower than the inflation rate in England, Germany or Japan.
  • The Dow Jones Industrial average, which was struggling to reach 30,000 in the last year of the Trump presidency, is now close to 40,000, which means more money in the bank account of anyone with a pension fund or a 401(k).
  • And paychecks are rising faster than inflation.

So we should be happy, right?

But we’re not. Yes, a whopping 78% of us are “very” or “somewhat satisfied with our lives.” An astonishing number.

But there’s a darker side. In 2022 America was one of the eleven happiest nations in the world.  Now, a mere two years later, America has fallen to the 23rd slot, below Costa Rica and Kuwait.

And a February Gallup Poll revealed that Americans are the unhappiest they’ve been in nearly 50 years.  Pew Research agrees.  58% told Pew that “life in America is worse today than it was 50 years ago.”

Why all this unhappiness when the economy is soaring?  Because of something called the J curve.

The J-curve shows up when your expectations are rising, and suddenly your expectations are blocked.

In laboratory experiments, rats were put in a maze that looked like a lane in a bowling alley.  Every time the rats ran from the starting point to the maze’s  end, they got food.  This was done over and over until the rats had a solid expectation of food at the end of their run.

Then the experimenters pulled a nasty trick.  They put an electrified grid across the alley just before the feeding point.

So a rat ran down the maze expecting a snack, but just before he hit the dining-spot his feet were sizzled. In other words, the experimenters shattered the rat’s expectations of a treat.

This drove rats into depression. Or a fury.

The J curve works in geopolitics when a people’s quality of life has been improving for a long time, then is suddenly stopped from getting any better or is sometimes even shoved backwards.

For example, the French were on a steady rise in the quality of their lives for decades in the 1700s, then were suddenly stopped by a global food shortage and an international depression.  When even the price of a Frenchwoman’s daily bread went up, the result was the French Revolution.

190 years later, in 1979, Iran had been on a long rise in its standard of living.  Suddenly that steady rise stopped dead in its tracks.  Like the rat, the Iranians went into a fury.  They tossed out their ruler, the shah, and pulled off the revolution that brought in the tyranny of the religious scholars, the tyranny of today’s Ayatollahs.

Is anything like that happening in America today? During Covid, people were flush with cash from stimulus checks, child tax credits, and the suspension of student debt payments.  But when Covid ended, the subsidies stopped.

And inflation had added more than 25% to the cost of food and rent.  That inflation was thanks to Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine, a war that cut off a quarter of Europe’s oil supply and sent prices soaring.

In other words, history and Vladimir Putin had turned on the electrified grid at the end of our alley.

One person speaking to PBS’s Paul Solman said that his parents had owned their own home, two cars, and had had a reliable income. But now buying a home is out of reach.  And because of the costs of child care, he and his fiancée can’t imagine having kids.  His expectations have been blocked.

A woman talking to PBS explained that when the pandemic ended, her student loan payments resumed.  She owes $100,000.  And that compromises her credit.  She has a hard time getting loans for her business.  And she has a hard time financing her car.

These are people with blocked expectations, severed expectations, amputated expectations.  And they are not happy.

References:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/610133/less-half-americans-satisfied-own-lives.aspx

https://www.gallup.com/analytics/349487/world-happiness-report.aspx

INSIGHTS

Is COP Kicking the can further down the road…again?

Published

on

COP must evolve with the times, or go down the abyss of irrelevancy.

 

COP 30 lands in Belém, a vulnerable Amazon city, Nov 10–21, 2025. The host nation hopes to spotlight deforestation, Indigenous rights, and climate inequity. Brazil plans to launch the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF)—a proposed $125 billion blended‑finance fund to reward forest conservation.


What’s at risk

  • Affordability crisis: Belém has ~18,000 hotel beds for ~45,000 expected attendees. Room rates surged to $700–$2,000/night. Developing nations may be shut out.) Brazil has deployed cruise ships and capped rates for poorer countries—but gaps remain.
  • Credibility gap: A new highway cutting through protected rainforest (Avenida Liberdade) contradicts the summit’s conservation message—even though officials deny federal involvement.
  • Fossil fuel influence: COP media deal awarded to PR firm Edelman, which also represents Shell—sparking conflict concerns.

Why it may just “kick the can”

  • Progress stalled in Bonn: Critical texts—like the Just Transition Work Programme and the Gender Action Plan—are underpowered, with weakening language on Indigenous and gender justice. Negotiations postponed to Belém.
  • Ambitious goals, low political will: The annual climate finance scale-up roadmap to $1.3 trillion by 2035 lacks binding commitments. Most countries’ updated NDCs remain underwhelming.
  • Logistical chaos: Thousands of civil society, women groups, and youth may be excluded by cost and infrastructure constraints, undermining representation.

Why it still matters

  • Location is symbolic: Holding COP in the Amazon aims to humanize climate action, not sanitize it in luxury venues.
  • TFFF could deliver: If fully funded by COP or 2026, the forest conservation fund could redefine climate finance.
  • Health in focus: A WHO-led Climate & Health conference in Brasília is shaping a Health Action Plan for COP, embedding public health in climate policy.

Bottom line

COP 30 has the potential for impact—but so far, optics risk overshadowing outcomes. High costs, diluted ambition, fossil-fuel influence, and delayed mechanisms could make Belém another kickoff, not a game changer. Unless financial pledges and rights-centered action materialize, COP 30 may merely defer real climate solutions to the next summit.

 

Continue Reading

INSIGHTS

Understanding the Brazil Golden Visa Program

Published

on

As people in America–and worldwide–are rethinking their residencies, Brazil offers a unique opportunity.

Why it matters

Brazil’s investor visa (VIPER), launched in 2018 and expanded in 2025, offers straight to permanent residency, family inclusion, and a path to citizenship in ~4 years. Designed to attract foreign capital, it’s one of Latin America’s most competitive options.

✅ Pros

  • Low investment threshold: BRL 700K (~USD 140K) in the North/Northeast; BRL 1 M (~USD 200K) in other regions.
  • Fast processing: Approval typically in 3–6 months.
  • Minimal stay requirement: Spend just ~14 days every 2 years in Brazil to maintain residency.(
  • Path to citizenship: Apply after 4 years of residency; dual nationality allowed.
  • Family included: Spouse and dependents can join under the same investment.
  • Access to MERCOSUR: Freedom to live/work across South America and access public services locally.

❌ Cons & caveats

  • Capital-intensive: Though cheaper than many EU programs, still requires upfront investment.
  • Low liquidity: Must hold qualifying property or business for residency status.
  • Complex documentation: Must transfer funds through formal Brazilian banks; property deed must be fully registered.
  • Tax implications: Residents become Brazilian tax-liable; must file global income.
  • Risk & bureaucracy: Mistakes in property purchase or application can lead to denial.

⚙️ How it works

  1. Choose investment route:
    • Real estate: BRL 1M (~USD 200K), or BRL 700K in North/Northeast.
    • Business investment: As low as BRL 150K (~USD 30K) if it creates jobs or invests in tech.
  2. Acquire property or company with clean title in urban region.
  3. Transfer funds via central‑bank‑approved channels.
  4. Apply via MigrantWeb and attend a brief visit (~30 days in-country).
  5. Receive temp residency (2–4 years), then upgrade to permanent if holding the investment.
  6. Citizenship after residency plus Portuguese proficiency and clean record.

Real-world impact

  • Stimulates foreign investment into Brazilian real estate and startups.
  • Helps diversify global mobility: Dual citizens gain visa-free access to ~171 countries.
  • Competitive edge: Lower thresholds than Spain, Portugal, and others, with faster timelines and better climate

Who should consider it

  • Remote workers or retirees seeking affordable residency in Latin America
  • Investors looking for second passports or access to Mercosur markets
  • Entrepreneurs or families seeking global mobility and alternate residency options

Bottom line

Brazil’s Golden Visa isn’t just another residency-by-investment program—it’s a strategic gateway to permanent residency, citizenship, and regional access, at competitive cost and with minimal residency obligations.

Whether you’re buying property in Recife or launching a startup in São Paulo, Brazil offers a forward-facing bridge for global citizens—without the EU price tag.

Continue Reading

INSIGHTS

We don’t do “that” anymore!

Published

on

America’s public media system is stuck in a time warp — built for a world that no longer exists.


Back then…

When the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) was founded in 1967, there was:

  • ❌ No internet
  • ❌ No YouTube
  • ❌ No MP3s or MP4s
  • ❌ No smartphones
  • ❌ No TikTok, file sharing, livestreams, or global DIY distribution

NPR, PBS, and local community stations were born in the age of vinyl and rabbit ears — and many still operate like it’s 1975.

The old model

  • Broadcast licenses → transmit radio/TV signals
  • Federal subsidies + pledge drives → fund operations
  • Audience = passive receivers
    All built for one-to-many media when the internet has made everyone a node.

The new reality

Welcome to media in motion:

  • Creators self-distribute across platforms
  • Real-time news spreads peer-to-peer
  • Audiences expect participation, not programming
  • Livestreams, podcasts, and video-on-demand rule attention

It’s horse and buggy vs the electric car, and too much of public media is still shoveling hay.

Why it matters

Then Now
Top-down Peer-to-peer
Static schedules On-demand, everywhere
Centralized stations Decentralized communities
Annual pledge drives Micro-giving, crowdfunding, subscriptions

We can’t build the future with our minds in the past. Yet too much of public media clings to legacy systems, dated org charts, and siloed content.

What’s being lost

  • Entire generations under 40 have no relationship with public radio or TV
  • Community voices, diverse stories, and local impact are drowned out by outdated delivery
  • Opportunity for global collaboration, multilingual content, and co-creation is missed

Public media could be a participatory ecosystem — but instead, it’s often a museum exhibit of what media used to be.

What’s next

✅ Shift from broadcast to networked ecosystems
✅ Enable community-owned media nodes
✅ Train creators in digital-first storytelling
✅ Embrace open-source, global collaboration
✅ Reimagine the CPB as a commons infrastructure, not a broadcast subsidy

Bottom line

We don’t do that anymore.

Public media must evolve—or become irrelevant. This is not business as usual. It’s time to flip the script—before the last station fades to static.

 

Continue Reading