Connect with us

Uncategorized

Some call it bribes.

Published

on

By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 6th January 2024

There are elements of fascism, elements borrowed from the Chinese state and elements that reflect Argentina’s history of dictatorship. But most of the programme for government announced by Javier Milei, the demagogic new Argentinian president, feels eerily familiar, here in the northern hemisphere.

A crash programme of massive cuts; demolishing public services; privatising public assets; centralising political power; sacking civil servants; sweeping away constraints on corporations and oligarchs; destroying regulations that protect workers, vulnerable people and the living world; supporting landlords against tenantscriminalising peaceful protest; restricting the right to strike. Anything ring a bell?

Milei is attempting, with a vast “emergency” decree and a monster “reform bill”, what the Conservatives have done in the UK over 45 years. The crash programme bears striking similarities to Liz Truss’s “mini” (maxi) budget, which trashed the prospects of many poor and middle-class people and exacerbated the turmoil that now dominates public life.

Coincidence? Not at all. Milei’s programme was heavily influenced by Argentinian neoliberal thinktanks belonging to something called the Atlas Network, a global coordinating body that promotes broadly the same political and economic package everywhere it operates. It was founded in 1981 by a UK citizen, Antony Fisher. Fisher was also the founder of the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), one of the first members of the Atlas Network.

The IEA created, to a remarkable degree, Liz Truss’s political platform. In a video conversation on the day of her “mini” budget with another member of the institute, its then director general, Mark Littlewood, observed: “We’re on the hook for it now. If it doesn’t work it’s your fault and mine.” It didn’t work – in fact, it crashed spectacularly, at great cost to us all – but, thanks to the UK’s media, the BBC included, which continue to treat these fanatical corporate lobbyists as purveyors of holy writ, they’re off the hook.

Last year, the IEA was platformed on British media an average of 14 times a day: even more often than before the disaster it helped inflict on the UK. Scarcely ever was it challenged about who funds it or whom it represents. The three peers nominated by Truss in her resignation honours list have all worked for or with organisations belonging to the Atlas Network (Matthew Elliott, TaxPayers’ Alliance; Ruth Porter, IEA and Policy Exchange; Jon Moynihan, IEA). Now, like US supreme court justices, they have been granted lifelong powers to shape our lives, without democratic consent. Truss also put forward Littlewood, but his reward for wrecking people’s lives was blocked by the House of Lords appointments commission.

Nothing has been learned: these corporate lobby groups still mould our politics. Policy Exchange, which, as Rishi Sunak has admitted, “helped us draft” the UK’s vicious new anti-protest laws, is also a member of the Atlas Network. We might describe certain policies as being Milei’s or Bolsonaro’s, or Truss’s or Johnson’s or Sunak’s, but they’re all variations on the same themes, hatched and honed by junktanks belonging to the same network. Those presidents and prime ministers are just the faces the programme wears.

And who, in turn, are the junktanks? Many refuse to divulge who funds them, but as information has trickled out we have discovered that the Atlas Network itself and many of its members have taken money from funding networks set up by the Koch brothers and other rightwing billionaires, and from oilcoal and tobacco companies and other life-defying interests. The junktanks are merely the intermediaries. They go into battle on behalf of their donors, in the class war waged by the rich against the poor. When a government responds to the demands of the network, it responds, in reality, to the money that funds it.

The dark-money junktanks, and the Atlas Network, are a highly effective means of disguising and aggregating power. They are the channel through which billionaires and corporations influence politics without showing their hands, learn the most effective policies and tactics for overcoming resistance to their agenda, and then spread these policies and tactics around the world. This is how nominal democracies become new aristocracies.

They also seem to be adept at shaping public opinion. For example, around the world, neoliberal junktanks have not only lobbied for extreme anti-protest measures, but have successfully demonised environmental protesters as “extremists” and “terrorists”. This might help to explain why peaceful environmental campaigners blocking a road are routinely punched, kicked and spat upon, and in some places run over or threatened with guns, by other citizens, while farmers or truckers blocking a road are not. It might also explain why there is scarcely a murmur of media coverage or public concern when extreme penalties are imposed: such as the six-month prison sentence handed in December to the climate campaigner Stephen Gingell for slow-marching along a London street.

But the worst is yet to come. Donald Trump has never developed a coherent platform of his own. He doesn’t have to. His policies have been written for him, in a 900-page Mandate for Leadership produced by a group of thinktanks led by the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation is – you got there before me – a member of the Atlas Network. Many of the proposals in the “mandate” are, frankly, terrifying. They have nothing to do with public demands and everything to do with the demands of capital.

When Friedrich Hayek and others first formulated the principles of neoliberalism, they believed it would defend the world from tyranny. But as the big money poured in, and an international network of neoliberal thinktanks was created to develop and articulate its demands, the programme that was supposed to liberate us became a new source of oppression.

In Argentina, where Milei has stepped into the vacuum left by the gross misrule of his predecessors and is able to impose, in true shock doctrine fashion, policies that would otherwise be fiercely resisted, the poor and middle classes are about to pay a terrible price. How do we know? Because very similar programmes have been dumped on other countries, beginning with Argentina’s neighbour Chile, after Augusto Pinochet’s coup in 1973.

These junktanks are like the spike proteins on a virus. They are the means by which plutocratic power invades the cells of public life and takes over. It’s time we developed an immune system.

www.monbiot.com

Continue Reading

It's not business as usual anymore

What’s Florida Hiding?

Published

on

Right now, Florida doesn’t feel or act like it’s learned that invaluable lesson for a better future from our dark past, and as William Faulkner once said,

“The past is not dead, it’s not even past.”

Let us ask ourselves, “Why are books being banned, truth being hidden and covered up, white collar criminals allowed to hold public office or run for office? What are these unethical leaders afraid of?  Is the truth so difficult to handle?

By asking these questions, we uncover the stories of what really happened.  In the case of the film, “The Poison Garden” we are provided with a front row seat to the true story of three cases of official and judicial violence that occurred both in and out of the courts in South Florida in 1933, 1934, and 1935.

This story transports the audience to South Florida during the so-called “Dirty Thirties”.

“When politicians intentionally distort the truth about white supremacy and slavery by describing it as a “job opportunity” for blacks and refusing to allow our public schools and businesses to teach its true horrors because it might make students “uncomfortable” — that will only perpetuate the myths of white supremacy and “white-wash” our true history.” -Chris Mancini, Former D.O.J. Prosecutor and Producer of “The Poison Garden”


According to Chris Mancini, Producer of “Poison Garden, 
“In the four years since George Floyd’s murder, most initiatives to reform the criminal justice system and policing have failed. The George Floyd Act attempted to standardize the use of force by police nationwide, but it will never be enacted.
Floyd’s brother, Philonise, recently started crying when asked about the slow pace of police reforms and replied:   
“What’s it going to take?”
The answer is that instead of the “one size fits all” approach of laws like The George Floyd Act, we need new laws that everyone can agree upon — “Racial Criminal Justice Act” — that will reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in McKlesky v. Kemp and empower trial courts for the first time to fashion appropriate remedies for racism in law enforcement on a case by case basis.
To dramatize this need, The Poison Garden faithfully recreates the 1934 trial of Walter “Doc” Williams by which Doc Williams was railroaded into the electric chair for the rape of a white woman, a crime he did not commit.
The trial of Walter “Doc” Williams, was accurately recreated with live actors in the original courtroom at the courthouse (built in 1925) where the Williams trial was held in 1934. The film incorporates original news footage and concludes with commentary by family members of lynching victim Ruben Stacey, searing commentary by those who were unjustly condemned to death row and their family members, and academics and attorneys who explain why New York and South Florida’s criminal justice systems are broken and what must be done to fix them.

What was the driving force that led you into producing “The Poison Garden?”

Chris:  In 1968, I was 14 and working as a volunteer at a phone bank at the Rochester NY headquarters of Bobby Kennedy’s presidential campaign when we received word of his assassination. I remember looking back at the empty rows of phone tables and being the last person to leave, shutting off the lights as I went. That experience left me, naturally. with a feeling of great loss but also with the determination to see that I hadn’t spent my free time volunteering for nothing and that RFK’s promises to improve criminal justice in America still needed to be fulfilled. I am also determined to correct the false historical depiction of lawyering in the South in the 1930’s as portrayed in To Kill A Mockingbird and to show folks what the real Atticus Finch’s and Southern Sheriff’s of that era were up to.

Evellyn:   My practice of Nichiren Daishonin Buddhism has taught me that we need to fight injustice anywhere it occurs and my curating South Florida crime history exhibits has inspired me tell these true crime stories to inspire others to fight this form of social oppression.

How has your background as a former Department of Justice (DOJ) PROSECUTOR helped you in producing it?

My career in USDOJ law enforcement was a natural progression from my years of Jesuit education and as a public defender in Milwaukee, one of the poorest, most over policed and segregated cities in America.

I went from the trenches of street crime in Milwaukee to prosecuting large federal racketeering cases but all my experience has lead me to understand that nothing will change for the better in our criminal justice system under the false premises that every criminal had a choice and acted only out of free will and that we, under the flawed system we have designed, do not share a collective responsibility for every crime that is committed.

We have never seen crime and the people who commit it as our neighbors and as clients and until we do, we will never curb it, to the fullest extent that is possible.

How can this film be transformed into action at the local, state and National level? What are the steps that you envision.

Once we can show the film in both blue and red state schools like Florida (where it’s been banned until recently under blatantly unconstitutional laws like the STOP WOKE Act) we can move its audiences to understand the need to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1987 Dredd Scott-like ruling in McKlesky v. Kemp and to enact a federal Racial Justice Act (RJA) like California’s. A national RJA will open our state courts to discovery processes in aid of proving the debilitating presence of racism in law enforcement and provide an adversarial courtroom process to investigate, adjudicate, expose and remedy its corrupting influences.

You currently live in South Florida. How has the current DeSantis administration suppressed your ability to show this locally? What is their concern? What are they afraid of?

They’re afraid of the truth. When politicians intentionally distort the truth about white supremacy and slavery by describing it as a “job opportunity” for blacks and refusing to allow our public schools and businesses to teach its true horrors because it might make students “uncomfortable” — that will only perpetuate the myths of white supremacy and “white-wash” our true history.

In making the film we were mindful of Gov. DeSantis’s false claim that no one complained about slavery until the American Revolution. Well what about the slaves themselves or the many abolitionist movements that long proceeded the American Revolution? I guess they don’t count to him and that’s what you’ll get when you allow politicians to rewrite history, to ban books and to control educational principles to meet a political agenda.

Florida has been known as a place for tourists. But in addition to tourism, there exists a large agricultural industry. Sugar, fruits and vegetables. DeSantis has drawn a red line in the sand prohibiting the progress of alternative proteins and foods. But the agriculture industry, including livestock is a major contributor to climate change and environmental destruction. What is he thinking and why?

I can’t read Gov. DeSantis’s mind, but history in Florida is clearly repeating itself now. The true history of racism in Florida that goes back to the 1930’s (which we depict in the film) tells us that we lead the nation in lynchings during the 1930’s as part of a terror campaign to support our white agricultural growers efforts to deter blacks from leaving their fields during The Great Migration in the midst of The Mexican Deportation Act. There’s a valuable history lesson there to question what the true underlying financial motives are for the recent discussions about the mass deportation of immigrants and the power that agriculture and tourism yield over our lawmakers in Tallahassee to the derogation of basic human rights.

As a federal prosecutor, you have seen up and close, the dark side of society. How bad is it here in Florida? Drug cartels, smuggling, prostitution, money laundering and the trafficking of women and children?

How do you remain hopeful?

We have grandchildren in Florida and nothing motivates us more than our hopes for them having a better future. But Florida has always been the “The Casablanca of The South”, the last stop on the koo-koo train and the refuge for selfish scoundrels in our politics who say they are seeking office to “do good” for us all but stick around to “do well” by themselves and the small tribal groups that support them. We all want the same things, but Florida will only achieve them when we work together to end the culture that promotes the belief that in order for some of us to win, the “others” among us have to lose.

Right now, Florida doesn’t feel or act like it’s learned that invaluable lesson for a better future from our dark past, and as William Faulkner once said, “The past is not dead, it’s not even past.”

Continue Reading

DO IT ACTIVISM

The Community Rights Movement

Published

on

Does our current economic system truly serve us, or are we serving it?

Is our environment merely a resource for exploitation, or a precious sphere of life that demands respect and protection?

Imagine a world where communities decide their Destiny,

Where nature is not just a resource,  but a living entity with rights .

Welcome to the community Rights Movement

A powerful wave of change sweeping across the United States. (And around the world.)

This movement is about people taking power into their own hands,

Envisioning a new sustainability Constitution and adopting new laws at the local level. it’s about challenging the system that prioritizes corporate rights over the rights of communities and nature.

The community Rights Movement is grounded in nonviolent Civil Disobedience using Municipal lawmaking to push for change.

At its core it aims to recognize and enforce the rights of Nature and ecosystems.

This isn’t a New Concept but rather an ancient understanding, traced back to indigenous cultures.

For them nature isn’t property to be owned but a living entity a relative.

The Anishnabe,  for example speak of protecting the flying people, swimming people, singing people.

The Urok nation regards the Clamo River as a living being a relative.

Contrast this with the Western perspective where nature is seen as a commodity, a thing to be exploited.  It hearkens back to the words of Sir Francis Bacon who urged us to “torture nature on a rack to extract her Secrets.”

The community Rights Movement is challenging these outdated views following the trail blazed by Pioneers like Christopher Stone in his seminal work , “Should trees have standing”  towards legal rights for natural objects.

Stone argued for conferring rights onto entities previously considered right-less.

So where do we stand now?

We’re at a critical juncture the future of our environment our communities our very way of life hangs in the balance.

The community Rights Movement offers a different path a path where Nature’s rights are recognized,  where communities have a say in their Destiny, where the economic system serves us,  not the other way around.

The community Rights Movement is not just a movement
but a necessary shift in perspective;

It’s about empowering communities, recognizing the rights of Nature and challenging an economic system that has long prioritized profit over people and the planet.

It’s about envisioning a world where sustainability respect and Community are not just ideals but the foundation of our society.

 

Words: Thomas Linzey, CDER: Center for Democratic Environmental Rights

Production: Mobilized

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Rest in Peace, Bertie Bowman

Published

on


A civil liberties minute from the ACLU.

Herbert Bowman (April 12, 1931 – October 25, 2023) was an American congressional staffer who served as the hearing coordinator of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations from 2000 to 2021. He began working at the U.S. Capitol in 1944 at the age of 13.

Continue Reading