Clean and Renewable Energy

Major clean-energy investment surge in India (and emerging markets)

Update: A new study finds that the transition to clean energy in emerging economies will cost only ~US$121 billion for nine major G20 emerging markets between 2024-2030. India alone needs about US$57 billion to raise its renewable share from ~45 % to ~63 % of installed capacity.

Why it matters:

  • The dramatic cost drops in solar, wind and battery storage (solar down ~83 % since 2010; wind ~42 %; batteries ~90 %) is making the renewable transition far more affordable.
  • This makes clean energy not just a climate imperative but a cost-competitive, accessible choice — especially in emerging economies.
    System upgrade / impact angle:
  • With such cost declines, systems upgrades become viable: grid integration of higher renewable shares, improved storage deployment, decentralized deployment (rooftops, agrivoltaics) become more affordable.
  • The affordability unlock means money can be shifted from fossil-fuel systems to renewable-storage-grid upgrade systems, enabling better reliability and access.

Implications:

  • For low-income or moderate-income regions, this means greater chance of affordable clean power rather than luxury/elite deployment.
  • For global supply chains and manufacturers, a larger addressable market for modules, batteries, storage systems.
  • For your mission (solutions-focused media), the story shifts: the transition isn’t only about cost barriers anymore — it’s about rollout, access, integration, community participation.

Global systems-scale renewable build-up: International Energy Agency (IEA) report

Update: The IEA’s latest analysis shows that renewables (especially solar) will grow faster than any other major energy source over the next few years, and that a supply boom of cheaper renewables will “seal the end of the fossil-fuel era.”

Why it matters:

  • This signals a systems-upgrade moment: the energy sector is shifting from incremental renewable addition to a transformative scale of deployment.
  • It implies that grids, storage systems, and integration infrastructure must ramp up accordingly — not just adding wind turbines but upgrading the entire system to absorb high renewable shares.
    System upgrade / impact angle:
  • Grid infrastructure: stronger interconnections, smart grid upgrades, more flexible load management to handle variable renewables.
  • Storage & balancing systems become critical: as supply of cheap renewables increases, you need storage to smooth and stabilize.
  • Cost-down threshold being hit means affordable renewable energy can scale — which supports your focus on “affordable” and “accessible” clean energy.

Implications:

  • For your media platform, this reinforces that the narrative is shifting from “will it happen?” to “how fast and how inclusive?”
  • There’s opportunity to highlight system-upgrade stories (grid modernization, storage adoption, community-scale projects) rather than just generation.
  • For communities and creators: there’s more space for solutions-based stories around access, resilience, new business models (prosumers, local microgrids).

U.S. state-level system upgrade example: California battery & clean-generation expansion

Update: California announced record growth in battery storage and clean energy leadership: battery systems now provide “enough capacity to meet the equivalent of roughly one-quarter of California’s record peak demand for several hours.”
Also note the state is meeting nearly six hours per day of 100% clean energy in some areas.

Why it matters:

  • This is a concrete example of the system-upgrade process: replacing/reducing fossil-fuel plants, integrating much larger storage capacity, pre-deploying resources ahead of storms, etc.
  • It demonstrates how “affordable clean energy” isn’t only about generation cost, but about reliability, resilience, and grid services — making clean power a viable baseline, not just an add-on.
    System upgrade / impact angle:
  • Storage deployment at scale → boosts the value of renewables by making them dispatchable, supporting peak demand.
  • Pre-deployment of resources ahead of storms/in extreme weather shows the resilience dimension — which ties into affordability when disruptions are fewer and power is more reliable.
  • Retiring coal/fossil plants means long-term system cost savings, and cleaner grid operations.

Implications:

  • For communities: cleaner, more resilient power with fewer outages; potential cost savings down the line.
  • For creators/communicators: storytelling around “how a state built battery capacity to meet ¼ of peak demand” is powerful — shows technical upgrade + social benefit.
  • For policy/finance shows the investment case for storage and grid upgrades is real and measurable, not just theoretical.

 



Affordable + accessible: With cost declines in renewables and storage, clean energy is increasingly affordable. The focus shifts to access, scale, and system integration.

  • System upgrades matter: It’s not just about adding solar/wind — it’s about upgrading grids, storage, resilience, community deployment, manufacturing, supply-chains. These are the “upgrade” stories.
  • Emerging markets leadership: Much of the action is in emerging economies (India, Southeast Asia, Africa) where affordability and access are critical — aligning with your “solutions” orientation.
  • Resilience & reliability: The interplay of affordability + reliability (battery, grid upgrades) means clean energy is viable for all — not just green branding, but functional infrastructure.
  • Narrative shift: From “can we do it?” to “how fast and how equitably will we do it?” offers a rich storytelling angle for your platform and event work (e.g., your summit, media kit).
  • Action focus: Stories could highlight what local communities, creators or regions can do to leverage these system-upgrades: e.g., community storage, rooftop solar + storage bundles, micro-grids for underserved areas, policy/financing models for affordability.


India – ADB backs 2.8 GW hybrid renewables + storage (ReNew)

What happened

  • ReNew received US$331M in financing from the Asian Development Bank for a 2.8 GW hybrid project in India combining ~837 MWp of wind & solar with a 415 MWh BESS, designed to deliver 300 MW of firm peak power.

System upgrade

  • This is not “just another solar farm” — it’s hybrid generation + storage engineered to behave like baseload power, directly replacing fossil peaker plants on the grid.

Impact / affordability

  • Hybrid + storage lets utilities buy firm clean power at predictable prices, reducing exposure to volatile fossil fuel costs and improving reliability for end-users.

 

Andhra Pradesh, India – Massive MoU for wind, solar, storage & green hydrogen

What happened

  • Andhra Pradesh signed an MoU with Evren (Brookfield JV) and Axis Energy for ₹1.1 lakh crore (≈ US$13B) in investments: **6,500 MW wind, 6,500 MW solar, 6,500 MWh storage, plus 0.25 MTPA green H₂ and 1 MTPA derivatives.

System upgrade

  • This is a whole-system build-out: generation + storage + green hydrogen production integrated from the start, serving state utilities, data centers, and green manufacturing.

Impact / affordability

  • Scale drives down per-unit costs and creates a regional clean-energy industrial base, making it cheaper for industry and potentially households to access clean power.

U.S. (Texas/Utah) – Rio Tinto’s 78.5 MW wind PPA for decarbonized copper

What happened

  • Rio Tinto signed a 15-year virtual PPA with TerraGen to source 78.5 MW of renewable energy from the Monte Cristo I wind project in Texas to help power its Kennecott copper operation in Utah.

System upgrade

  • This ties critical minerals supply (copper for clean tech) directly to renewable power, cutting Scope 1 & 2 emissions and raising the share of renewables in Rio’s power mix toward its 90% by 2030 target.

Impact / affordability

  • Decarbonizing copper production lowers the embedded emissions (and future carbon cost risk) in EVs, wind turbines, and solar, helping keep clean-tech costs down over time.

 

Colorado, U.S. – $317M grid-scale battery storage (Peregrine Energy)

What happened

  • Peregrine Energy Solutions secured funding for a US$317M battery energy storage project based in Colorado.

System upgrade

  • Large grid-scale storage projects like this soak up cheap solar/wind when available and discharge during peaks, reducing the need for expensive peaker plants.

Impact / affordability

  • Over time, that can lower wholesale power prices at peak, helping keep bills down while making high renewable penetration viable.

U.S. (multi-state) – Sodium-ion batteries step onto the grid (Peak Energy & Jupiter Power)

What happened

  • U.S. startup Peak Energy will deploy a 720 MWh sodium-ion BESS for Jupiter Power, with 4 GWh more under reservation.

System upgrade

  • Sodium-ion uses more abundant materials than lithium; commercial deployment at this scale is a technology upgrade that can ease raw-material constraints and diversify supply chains.

Impact / affordability

  • If it performs well, sodium-ion could offer cheaper, more widely available storage, especially important for emerging markets and community-scale projects.

Virginia, U.S. – Dominion’s largest slate of solar + storage yet

What happened

  • Dominion Energy asked state regulators to approve its largest package of solar and battery projects ever, across Virginia.

System upgrade

  • Portfolio approach: multiple solar farms + batteries integrated into planning, not one-off pilots — a sign that utility planning is shifting toward renewables-first.

Impact / affordability

  • As these projects enter the rate base, they can replace or avoid new gas plants, stabilizing long-term costs for customers and cutting emissions.

 

Indiana, U.S. – 200 MW Appleseed Solar Project goes live (NextEra)

What happened

  • NextEra Energy Resources and local officials celebrated the start of operations at the 200 MW Appleseed Energy Center in Cass County, Indiana, meant to support NIPSCO’s reliability plans.

System upgrade

  • This is part of a coal-to-clean transition in the Midwest, reinforcing grid reliability using large-scale solar as legacy fossil units retire.

Impact / affordability

  • New utility-scale solar in coal regions usually delivers lower levelized costs than new fossil generation, especially once tax credits are factored in.

 

U.S. – Community solar on toxic Superfund sites (CleanCapital)

What happened

  • CleanCapital completed construction of two community-solar projects on former Superfund sites, turning contaminated land into power-producing assets.

System upgrade

  • This is land-use optimization + justice: using otherwise unusable land for local clean power and community subscriptions.

Impact / affordability

  • Community solar models typically offer bill savings to low- and moderate-income subscribers without requiring rooftop ownership or credit-heavy financing.

Global / Denmark – Ørsted hits 98% emissions cuts ahead of target

What happened

  • Ørsted announced it has reduced its carbon emissions by 98%, becoming the first energy company to fully achieve its science-based 2025 decarbonization target.

System upgrade

  • This represents a full corporate-system pivot: from fossil-heavy utility to near-fully renewable operator (offshore wind + other clean assets).

Impact / affordability

  • Large incumbents proving they can switch business models de-risks renewables for investors, improving access to capital and helping lower financing costs for new projects.

California, U.S. – Battery recycling for giant Moss Landing BESS (ABTC & EPA)

What happened

  • The U.S. EPA appointed American Battery Technology Company (ABTC) to recycle up to 100,000 Li-ion battery modules from California’s Moss Landing BESS as part of a clean-up and repurposing program.

System upgrade

  • This is a move towards a circular battery economy: large-scale recycling of grid batteries to recover critical materials and reduce waste/risks.

Impact / affordability

  • Successful recovery of lithium, nickel, etc., lowers dependence on new mining and can reduce long-term material costs for storage, which feeds into more affordable clean power.

 

Launch of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) & One Planet Network “Global Circularity Protocol (GCP)”

  • What happened: On 11 November 2025 at COP30 (Belém), WBCSD and One Planet Network officially launched the GCP, described as “the world’s first voluntary science-based, globally harmonized framework designed to help companies of all sizes measure, manage, and communicate their circular performance and impacts across value chains.”
  • Why it matters: For the circular economy it marks a new benchmark: companies now have a global standard for reporting material flows, reuse, recycling, waste prevention, etc. The analysis behind it suggests that “by 2050” widespread adoption could save up to 120 billion tons of materials and avoid 76 gigatons CO₂.
  • System upgrade: This is a governance & metrics systems upgrade — not just more recycling plants, but improved transparency, standardization, and comparability across industries. It helps shift circularity from niche to mainstream corporate strategy.
  • Impact:
    • For business: better measurement drives better decision-making, cost savings from material reuse, reduced supply-chain risks.
    • For communities: if companies adopt it, that could drive more circular infrastructure (collection systems, reuse loops) and reduce waste leakage.
    • For your media platform: strong story-angle — “How corporate accountability frameworks are becoming the backbone of circular systems.”

First-ever “Circular Economy Day” at COP30

  • What happened: On 13 November 2025 during COP30, there was the first dedicated Circular Economy Day, signaling that material/resource systems are now formally part of the global climate agenda rather than side-issues.
  • Why it matters: Historically climate talks focus on energy, emissions, forests. Bringing circular economy front and center means material flows, waste, reuse are formally part of climate mitigation strategy.
  • System upgrade: This is a policy/agenda systems upgrade — having material-use and waste systems integrated into global climate frameworks, signalling future regulatory, investment and infrastructure shifts.
  • Impact:
    • For investors & funders: more capital may flow into projects focused on closing material loops, recycling advanced technologies, secondary-raw-material supply chains.
    • For makers & innovators: stronger signal that circular-materials business models will be supported, regulated, tracked.

Spain (via European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency – CINEA) drives circular-materials & recycling projects

  • What happened: On 10 November 2025 the European Climate, Infrastructure & Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) published updates on Spain’s circular-economy strategy: goals such as reducing national material consumption by 30% relative to GDP, cutting waste generation 15%, halving food waste per person by 2030, improving water-efficiency by 10% — and deploying EU-funded projects turning waste into new materials.
  • Why it matters: This is a concrete national-level upgrade of how resource systems are managed: from linear “take-make-dispose” to circular “recover-reuse-recycle redesign”.
  • System upgrade: Infrastructure + policy + innovation: building new recycling loops, re-purposing waste streams into new raw‐materials, upgrading regional cooperation & funding.
  • Impact:
    • For local economies: green jobs, new manufacturing from recycled streams, less dependence on virgin resource imports.
    • For affordability & resilience: cheaper secondary materials reduce cost volatility of raw materials, strengthen supply chains.

 



Takeaways

  • Measurement & governance now matter: The GCP launch shows that circularity isn’t only about building recycling plants, but tracking, reporting, benchmarking.
  • Materials & resource pillars shifting: With Circular Economy Day, materials are becoming part of the climate conversation — the base of many systems (electronics, infrastructure, packaging) must now upgrade.
  • From policy + strategy → implementation: Spain’s example indicates that national strategy, EU funding and project build-out are catching up — meaning stories of actual circular-material projects (waste-to-materials, reuse clusters) will proliferate.
  • Action-able media angles:
    • “What businesses must track to claim they’re circular” (metrics & GCP)
    • “Why waste is now central to climate talks — and what this means for your city/region”
    • “How national strategies like Spain’s are creating new material-loops and industrial opportunities.”

 



India: Foundry sand → bricks initiative at CSIR‑NIIST

  • What’s new: A new technology was developed by CSIR-NIIST that turns spent foundry sand (a by-product of metal casting) into bricks, paving tiles and interlocks. A production unit collaborating with industry will produce ~5,000 bricks daily using ~30 tonnes of waste sand.
  • Why it matters: Foundry sand is typically landfill-bound; repurposing it into construction materials reduces virgin raw-material demand and landfill burden.
  • System upgrade: This is a feed-stock-innovation upgrade: taking a waste stream and looping it back into a value chain (construction materials) rather than disposal.

U.S. Midwest: Food-waste-to-energy & compost at Green Era + Denali partnership

  • What’s new: Denali, a national organics recycler, partnered with Green Era (a food-waste-only digester in Chicago) to scale recycling of packaged/in-edible food waste. The agreement expands capacity to divert >150 million pounds of food waste annually.
  • Why it matters: Food-waste recovery is a major circular-economy lever (reduces methane emissions, creates compost or biogas).
  • System upgrade: This is a logistics + infrastructure upgrade: scaling collection + anaerobic digestion + compost/energy output in an existing urban region, enabling more circular food-residue systems.

Spain: Circular economy strategy “España Circular 2030” — EU-funded projects accelerating

  • What’s new: Spain announced that under the España Circular 2030 strategy it aims to reduce material consumption by 30% (relative to GDP), cut waste by 15%, and halve food waste per person by 2030. EU funding and innovation support are underway.
  • Why it matters: National-scale commitment signals structural shifts in resource-use systems — planning for circularity rather than incremental tweaks.
  • System upgrade: This is a policy-system upgrade combined with infrastructure investment: strategy + funding + project build-out aligned for circular materials at national scale.

Italy: Ecomondo 2025 conference highlights five pioneering secondary-raw-material initiatives

  • What’s new: At Ecomondo (Rimini, Nov 13), five EU-funded projects (Wood2Wood, CIRCULess, ReBoat, EcoReFibre, Bio4EEB) were featured — focusing on wood waste, construction & demolition waste, secondary raw-materials logistics.
  • Why it matters: Construction & demolition waste is one of the largest waste streams in Europe (~450–500 million t/yr) and turning it into secondary raw-materials has huge circular potential.
  • System upgrade: This is a sector-specific upgrade: building circular loops in C&D, wood and other high-volume waste streams, not just packaging or plastics.

U.S. Oregon: First “hard-to-recycle” drop-off recycling hub (RecycleOn Oregon)

  • What’s new: In Ashland, Oregon, a new centre opened in early Nov to accept and process hard-to-recycle materials (plastic film, EPS foam, buckets, shredded paper). It is the first of 140+ planned under the state’s EPR (extended producer responsibility) packaging law.
  • Why it matters: Many circular-economy roadblocks come from “difficult” waste streams; creating infrastructure explicitly for them closes a major loop.
  • System upgrade: This is a collection-system upgrade: new facilities + EPR funding shifting cost burden and enabling more materials to enter circular flows rather than landfill.

Germany / Europe: Plans for a Munich “Circular Construction Hub”

  • What’s new: Munich is advancing plans (first concept workshop scheduled for Nov 2025) to build a circular-construction hub focused on reuse, modular building materials, and salvage of construction waste.
  • Why it matters: The built environment uses huge amounts of materials; a hub focused on reuse/design-for-circular could shift the fundamental structure of how buildings are built and de-constructed.
  • System upgrade: This is an urban-industrial upgrade: converting building material supply chains from virgin + disposal to reuse-oriented loops.

 

Canada (Nova Scotia & New Brunswick): New state-of-the-art recycling facility announced by Circular Materials

  • What’s new: Circular Materials announced that a new advanced recycling facility will serve both provinces, incorporating optical/NIR sorters and cutting-edge tech to improve recovery of packaging & paper.
  • Why it matters: Sorting and processing is often the bottleneck in achieving high-quality recycled output; modernizing these systems strengthens the circular supply chain.
  • System upgrade: This is a processing-system upgrade: better technology + logistics to raise recovery rates and material quality, enabling recycled materials to re-enter manufacturing rather than being “down-cycled”.